Important: We store all data on servers in New Zealand, Canada and/or Europe.Mega Limited (New Zealand company number 4136598) (“ MEGA”, “ we”, “ us” or “ our”) of Level 21, Huawei Centre, 120 Albert Street, Auckland, New Zealand is the data controller under the GDPR of all other personal information. You are the data controller under the GDPR of the personal information you provide to us as part of your Account Data (see below). It includes collection, storage, and all of the ways we use, and allow you to use, personal information, when we provide our services. The term “ processing” is used as defined in the GDPR. “ Personal information” is the New Zealand term for “ personal data” as defined in the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation EU2016/679 (“ GDPR”). This Policy governs our processing of your personal information and the way in which we deal with other data that is not personal information.While those instances reflect practical cases in which facial recognition could be helpful, those calling for the ban and boycotting the venues argue that its risks outweigh its benefits, and that biometric technology impedes privacy rights and increases discrimination against marginalized groups including people of color and members of the LGBTQ community. Taylor Swift, for instance, used facial recognition during her Reputation tour as a means of identifying her known stalkers. Venues themselves aren’t the only ones using the tech, and there are cases where the software could be beneficial. In 2022, Red Rocks Amphitheater in Denver abandoned Amazon’s palm-reading technology following a protest from the artists and Fight for the Future. This isn’t the first time Morello and some of the other signatories including Speedy Ortiz called for a ban on biometric tech at a famous venue. Morello and de la Rocha performed at Madison Square Garden with Rage Against the Machine last year. Watch Paramore Bring Out Lil Uzi Vert to Perform 'Misery Business' The facial recognition technology system does not retain images of individuals, with the exception of those who were previously advised they are prohibited from entering our venues, or whose previous misconduct in our venues has identified them as a security risk.” “While we understand this policy is disappointing to some, we cannot ignore the fact that litigation creates an inherently adversarial environment. “MSG instituted a straightforward policy that precludes attorneys from firms pursuing active litigation against the Company from attending events at our venues until that litigation has been resolved,” the company previously said. MSG sued over that decision and has repeatedly stood by its policy of barring the lawyers from its premises. As the New York Post previously reported, New York’s State Liquor Authority had initiated proceedings to remove MSG’s liquor license. Several New York lawmakers also staged a protest about the policy in January. Where can draw the line? Can he just draw it wherever he wants?”Įarlier this year, New York Attorney General Letitia James announced she was seeking out information regarding MSG’s use of the facial recognition tech, urging the company to roll back its policy. “It’s a really lousy extension of bullying behavior facilitated by the use of this technology,” Hart told Rolling Stone of her removal. Even scarier, though, is a world in which all facial recognition technology works 100% perfectly – in other words, a world in which privacy is nonexistent, where we’re identified, watched, and surveilled everywhere we go.” “For starters, this technology is so inaccurate that it actually creates more harm and problems than it solves, through misidentification and other technical faultiness. Not only is this false, it’s morally corrupt,” Leila Nashashibi, campaigner at Fight for the Future, said in a statement. “Surveillance tech companies are pitching biometric data tools as ‘innovative’ and helpful for increasing efficiency and security. The full list of signatories is available here. Other artists who said they would boycott include Anti-Flag, Wheatus, Downtown Boys, and over 80 additional artists. Several smaller independent concert venues across the country, including the House of Yes in Brooklyn, the Lyric Hyperion in Los Angeles, and Black Cat in D.C., also pledged to not use facial recognition tech for their shows. The boycott, organized by the digital rights advocacy group Fight for the Future, calls for the ban of face-scanning technology at all live events. Over 100 artists including Rage Against the Machine co-founders Tom Morello and Zack de la Rocha, along with Boots Riley and Speedy Ortiz, have announced that they are boycotting any concert venue that uses facial recognition technology, citing concerns that the tech infringes on privacy and increases discrimination.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |